This is somewhat uncomfortable to reveal, but I'll say it. Several titles wait next to my bed, every one incompletely read. On my mobile device, I'm some distance through thirty-six audiobooks, which looks minor compared to the nearly fifty digital books I've set aside on my digital device. That fails to include the growing collection of pre-release editions next to my coffee table, striving for blurbs, now that I work as a established author personally.
On the surface, these stats might appear to corroborate recent opinions about current concentration. A writer observed recently how simple it is to break a reader's concentration when it is divided by social media and the news cycle. They stated: “Maybe as readers' focus periods evolve the literature will have to change with them.” Yet as an individual who used to stubbornly finish every novel I started, I now view it a human right to put down a story that I'm not enjoying.
I wouldn't think that this practice is a result of a short focus – more accurately it stems from the feeling of time slipping through my fingers. I've always been impressed by the monastic principle: “Place death each day in mind.” One point that we each have a only 4,000 weeks on this planet was as shocking to me as to anyone else. But at what previous point in human history have we ever had such immediate access to so many mind-blowing creative works, anytime we desire? A glut of options greets me in each bookstore and behind any device, and I want to be deliberate about where I direct my time. Could “DNF-ing” a story (shorthand in the publishing industry for Incomplete) be not a sign of a limited mind, but a discerning one?
Notably at a period when the industry (consequently, selection) is still controlled by a specific social class and its concerns. Even though reading about people different from us can help to strengthen the ability for understanding, we additionally select stories to consider our individual lives and place in the universe. Unless the works on the racks more fully represent the experiences, lives and concerns of potential readers, it might be very difficult to hold their focus.
Certainly, some authors are indeed effectively writing for the “contemporary attention span”: the concise style of some current works, the compact pieces of different authors, and the quick sections of numerous contemporary stories are all a wonderful demonstration for a shorter approach and method. Furthermore there is an abundance of writing advice geared toward capturing a consumer: refine that first sentence, polish that start, elevate the tension (higher! further!) and, if writing mystery, place a dead body on the opening. This suggestions is entirely sound – a potential agent, publisher or buyer will use only a a handful of valuable moments deciding whether or not to forge ahead. It is no benefit in being obstinate, like the individual on a class I joined who, when questioned about the storyline of their book, declared that “the meaning emerges about 75% of the through the book”. No writer should subject their reader through a sequence of challenges in order to be grasped.
Yet I certainly create to be clear, as much as that is achievable. At times that needs holding the audience's hand, guiding them through the story point by succinct step. Occasionally, I've discovered, understanding demands patience – and I must allow my own self (as well as other writers) the permission of exploring, of layering, of straying, until I find something meaningful. A particular author makes the case for the fiction discovering fresh structures and that, instead of the standard plot structure, “alternative structures might enable us conceive novel methods to create our tales vital and real, keep making our books original”.
In that sense, both opinions agree – the story may have to evolve to fit the contemporary audience, as it has repeatedly accomplished since it first emerged in the 18th century (in the form today). Maybe, like previous writers, future creators will return to serialising their books in periodicals. The next such writers may already be publishing their work, part by part, on web-based services such as those visited by countless of monthly readers. Genres evolve with the times and we should allow them.
However we should not claim that all evolutions are all because of reduced attention spans. If that was so, concise narrative compilations and flash fiction would be regarded much more {commercial|profitable|marketable
A passionate writer and digital artist who shares innovative methods for blending words and visuals in storytelling.